Monday, February 22, 2016

Forms, Space, and Distinctions


“A universe comes into being when
a space is severed or taken apart… 
by tracing the way we 
[make such distinctions] 
we begin to reconstruct …  
the basic forms underlying linguistic,
mathematical, physical, 
and biological science.”

- G. Spencer Brown (1923 - )

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Between Something and Nothing


“Now, I am going to tell you something.
I don’t know what heading it comes under, 
and whether or not it is relevant here,
but it must be relevant at some point. 

It is not anything new, but I would like to say it. 

There is a beginning. There is no beginning of that beginning. 

There is no beginning of that no beginning of beginning.

 There is something. There is nothing. 

There is something before the beginning of something and nothing, 
and something before that. Suddenly there is something and nothing. 

But between something and nothing, 
I still don’t really know which is something and which is nothing.  

Now, I’ve just said something, 
but I don’t really know whether I’ve said anything or not.” 

- Chuang-Tzu (4th century BC)

Saturday, February 20, 2016

Expressions of Deep Order


"If biologists have ignored self-organization, it is not because self-ordering is not pervasive and profound. It is because we biologists have yet to understand how to think about systems governed simultaneously by two sources of order, Yet who seeing the snowflake, who seeing simple lipid molecules cast adrift in water forming themselves into cell-like hollow lipid vesicles, who seeing the potential for the crystallization of life in swarms of reacting molecules, who seeing the stunning order for free in networks linking tens upon tens of thousands of variables, can fail to entertain a central thought: if ever we are to attain a final theory in biology, we will surely, surely have to understand the commingling of self-organization and selection. We will have to see that we are the natural expressions of a deeper order. Ultimately, we will discover in our creation myth that we are expected after all."

(1939 - )

Friday, February 19, 2016

Limited in Time and Space


“A human being is part of the 
whole called by us a universe,
a part limited in time and space. 

He experiences himself, 
his thoughts and his feelings,
as something separate from the rest,
a kind of optical delusion 
of his consciousness.

This delusion is a kind of prison for us;
it restricts us to our personal decisions and our
affections to a few persons nearest to us. 

Our task must be to free 
ourselves from this prison by
widening our circle of 
compassion to embrace
all living creatures and the 
whole of nature of its beauty.” 

(1879 - 1955)

Thursday, February 18, 2016

Perception, Structure, Order


"When we observe something, then we reach for it; we move through space, touch things, feel their surfaces and contours. And our perception structures and orders the information given by things into determinable forms. We understand because this structuring and ordering is a part of our relationship with reality. Without order we couldn’t understand at all. Thus in my opinion the world is not raw material; it is already ordered merely by being observed.

Order is a necessary condition for anything the human mind is to understand. Arrangements such as the layout of a city or building, a set of tools, a display of merchandise, the verbal exposition of facts or ideas, or a painting or piece of music are called orderly when an observer or listener can grasp their overall structure and the ramification of the structure in some detail. Order makes it possible to focus on what is alike and what is different, what belongs together and what is segregated. When nothing superfluous is included and nothing indispensable left out, one can understand the interrelation of the whole and its parts, as well as the hierarchic scale of importance and power by which some structural features are dominant, others subordinate."

(1904 - 2007)

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

What is an Object?


“...Consider an object ...  what is an object? 

Philosophers are always saying, 
'Well, just take a chair for example.' 
The moment they say that, you know they 
do not know what they are talking about any more. 

What is a chair? 
Well, a chair is a certain thing over there ... 
Certain? How certain?
 The atoms are evaporating from it 
from time to time - not many atoms,
 but a few - dirt falls on it and 
gets dissolved in the paint; 
so to define a chair precisely, 
to say exactly which atoms are chair,
 and which atoms are air, or which atoms are dirt, 
or which atoms are paint that
 belongs to the chair is impossible. 

So the mass of a chair can be defined only approximately.

 In the same way, to define the mass of a single object is impossible,
 because there are not any single, left-alone objects in the world.”

(1918 - 1988)

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

Arbitrary Slices


“They will say: ‘Well, it’s a hexagon,’ but it isn’t a hexagon, and a rectangle which isn’t a rectangle. By describing what it nearly is but isn’t quite, they get a sort of description out. The division into parts is of course purely arbitrary. They could have sliced it anyway they wanted.”

- Gregory Bateson (1904 - 1980)